<link rel="stylesheet" href="theme-light.css" />
Blueprint

Yes, we copied TrustMRR (but not exactly)

Well — a third of it. The story is worth telling properly, because the difference between the thirds is basically our whole thesis.

October 28, 2025. Pieter Levels tweets that the MRR screenshots in your feed are fake. Half a million views, because everyone knows he's right. 48 hours later Marc Lou ships TrustMRR — a leaderboard of startups with revenue verified through read-only payment APIs. Built in about a day, seeded with his own 8 products, $18k MRR within 5 days. One of the cleanest speed-runs this scene has ever seen.

Everyone saw the leaderboard. I couldn't stop looking at the business model. TrustMRR's revenue doesn't come from the product — it comes from the sponsor slots along the sides, $1.5k–2k a month each. What Marc actually monetized is his distribution: an X audience plus SEO, packaged into a page where you can rent a slice of his traffic. Around $35k a month as I write this — a number most SaaS never touch, generated by a catalog. Zero shade. It's a masterclass, and we studied it.

The part I didn't buy was the job. TrustMRR drifted from leaderboard to marketplace — the browser tab literally reads "Buy and Sell SaaS Startups" now. And a marketplace visit is transactional: you list your startup for sale, you leave, you come back the day a buyer knocks. The site claims 180k monthly visitors; almost all of it lands on the front page and leaves. Which is fine — for that job. Selling your startup is something you do once.

But look at what's sitting underneath that job. A read-only key to a payment processor. A number nobody can fake. Trust, manufactured at the source. And here's the actual lesson of this post, so let me say it plainly: a mechanic and a job are different things. Verified revenue is a mechanic. "Sell your startup" is a job. Marc bolted them together in 48 hours, and the speed hid the fact that they're separable — the same mechanic can carry other jobs, including jobs much deeper than the one it launched with.

Here's the job we transplanted it onto. A builder doesn't need to sell their company daily. What they need daily is different: to know what's actually working for people like them, to be seen doing real work, to not build alone. That's not a transaction — that's a relationship. So we took the verified line and built the opposite product around it:

  • The line isn't a leaderboard here, it's the spine of a story. Teams publish episodes, and every episode drops a marker on the revenue graph: you read what they tried, then you watch what the line did about it. A leaderboard tells you who's winning. A marked-up line tells you how.
  • You don't browse startups, you follow people. Pilots, arcs, seasons, comment threads worth living in. You come back the way you come back to a series and the people watching it with you — not the way you check a catalog.
  • And the money flows the opposite direction. On a marketplace, a builder gets paid on the day they leave: the exit. Here, viewers back teams at $1 a month, and the platform pays a share of what it earns back to the builders who make it worth watching. You earn by staying, not by leaving.

Same ingredient, opposite physics. A marketplace visit ends a relationship. An episode continues one.

The takeaway, if you're building anything: ideas were never the scarce part, and since AI, even execution isn't. Proofs are scarce. When someone demonstrates that a mechanic works — people pay, come back, tell their friends — the interesting question is not "am I too late". It's "what other jobs could this mechanic carry". Nobody in this world is obligated to conjure a unicorn from a blank page; spotting a proven mechanic and pointing it at a job the original ignored is some of the highest-leverage work a small team can do. Marc himself did exactly that: leaderboards existed, ad slots existed, fake screenshots were an old joke. He composed known parts at the right 48 hours.

So, did we copy TrustMRR? We copied the proof — gratefully. The job, the retention, the economy got rebuilt from scratch around a different person: not the founder leaving, the builder staying. And sometimes the transplant outgrows the donor. TrustMRR is a brilliant 48-hour product that monetizes a moment of attention. Indie Valley wants to be infrastructure for everything around that attention — the stories, the people, the proof. I believe the deeper job makes this the bigger company. Believe, not know — and the difference between those two words is exactly what our own verified line is for. It's public, it runs by the same rules as everyone else's here, and it will grade this bet in front of you.

A marketplace is where a startup's story ends. We're building the place where it gets told.

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

@tomas-lindqvist· 3 months ago

"A mechanic and a job are different things" is the most useful sentence here, and it cuts both ways — half the AI products shipping right now are proven mechanics bolted onto jobs nobody has.

@ruth-mbeki· 3 months ago

Respect for naming the donor instead of pretending parallel invention. Though "sometimes the transplant outgrows the donor" is a bold sentence with the donor at five figures a month and you at zero — at least the scoreboard you picked is public.

Albert Metz
@albert· 3 months ago

That is the fun of it: the claim is dated, public, and wired to a payment processor. Either the line makes the argument for me, or it embarrasses me on the record. Both outcomes are content.